When it comes to weight loss, there are often many different types of information that is in circulation. Some people might point to specific foods to avoid, such as fast food or junk food, while others may even say that specific diets are the best way to go, such as paleo. However, some new studies have started to reveal that the best method to lose weight has a lot less to do with what kind of diet you are using and a lot more to do with how you are going about your diet.
In other words, a study from the scientific journal Obesity, found that dieters who experience high levels of weight fluctuation in the first few weeks of a weight loss program were more apt to fail in their long term weight loss goals. Why is that? Well, it seems to come from the fact that people who take fast and hard approaches to dieting tend to fall off the wagon very quickly. That’s why a more long term or gradual solution could be best, and why a lot of people are looking to Nutrisystem for men, and other similar systems for help.
On the other hand, those who adopt a slow and steady approach tend to have less drastic life changes and are able to adapt to their new lifestyle choices at a better rate. Not only does the slow and steady method work better in the short term, it also is extremely indicative of success in the long term. Crash dieters who have had seriously weight fluctuations in a weight loss program were more apt to gain their weight back 1-2 years later. In a controlled study where 183 participants were tested over the course of two years to monitor a weight loss journey, those who had the highest level of initial weight fluctuations had gained a lot of their weight back after the weight loss.
This up and down could be caused by a variety of different factors, and since the study is in the early stages of exploring the causation, it’s too early to say for certain that crash dieting is indicative of long term weight gain problems. However, it is still important to note that this also follows the conventional wisdom that crash dieting doesn’t work.
A slow and steady approach to weight loss will create more discipline in the individual, assist them in making better choices over the long run and isn’t as extreme as a hard and fast diet. While most diets are based on extreme levels of restriction, the precious willpower of the dieter can be depleted by this. If every day were about resisting temptation and denying the self, eventually the willpower of the dieter will run out. So he might start off strong on Monday but by Sunday night, he has exhausted all of his willpower and consequently will end up more vulnerable to his appetite. When contrasted with the slow and steady dieter who isn’t as focused on self denial but instead of lifestyle change, we will quickly see that he has a better chance of not breaking down completely. In other words, an all or nothing mentality has been shown time and time again to sabotage a diet more than any sweet treat possibly could.